Angry Reader Feedback to "A Motorcycle Friendly Nevada?" Article

My article, A Motorcycle Friendly Nevada, received national blogosphere attention.  For the most part, the article was well-received.  However, one Nevada reader took exception and wrote a letter to the editor demanding an apology from me.  The editor intended to publish that reader's letter along with my response to it.  Neither the letter nor my response were published on the insistence of the author of that letter.  That reader told my editor, “It’s up to you if you want to become the enemy of Nevada State motorcycle safety programs but I wouldn’t publish this.”

Here is that unedited, unpublished letter to the editor.....

Dear Quick Throttle Magazine,

Helmet Trial in Henderson, Nevada - Nelson "Renegade" Ruehl

On January 5, 2011, Nelson "Renegade" Ruehl had his helmet trial in Henderson, Nevada.  It was his first time to represent himself and he was MASTERFUL!

The courtroom was very empty.  There were only three Renegade supporters sitting towards the front of the courtroom and five uniformed Henderson police officers sitting in the back row.

From the beginning, Renegade established control over the trial.  His first statement was to get the police officer's pictures of Renegade's helmet thrown out.  Renegade told the judge that those pictures should not be used as evidence against him because Renegade had asked for those pictures and the prosecuting attorney failed to provide them.  The judge asked the prosecutor if that was true and the prosecutor tried to deny it.  Renegade lifted up his discovery sheets that he did receive and said, "This is all I got.  No pictures."  Then dialogue between the judge and the prosecutor went something like this:

Judge:  Don't you number your pages when you send discovery?
Prosecutor:  No.
Judge:  Don't you think that would be a good idea?
Prosecutor:  Yes.
Judge:  I won't allow any pictures.

Then the prosecutor called for the first and only witness, the police officer that gave Renegade a helmet ticket.  One of the statements the police officer said was, "I know what he was wearing was not D.O.T. approved."  Renegade pointed out that there is no such thing as "D.O.T. approved," and the prosecution changed their tune to say, "D.O.T. standards."

When it was time for Renegade to question his accuser, the police officer answered one of Renegade's questions with another question.  Renegade assertively said,"I'M ASKING THE QUESTIONS."

In the end, the judge found Renegade guilty, but the judge did not look Renegade in the eye to render his decision.  This judge KNOWS the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Renegade's helmet was illegal, but he found him guilty none the less.

Was the judge's decision influenced by the five uniformed police officers in his courtroom?  You decide.  But what this judge did do, was to further empower Henderson PD to continue their attacks against motorcyclists.

The judge's decision was the most beneficial to the helmet activism cause.  Now Renegade has an opportunity to appeal that finding to a higher court.  His helmet appeal will be the third being challenged in Clark County District Court at the time of this writing.

Congratulations to Renegade for standing up for himself and all motorcyclists in Nevada !!