The 2011 helmet-choice Bill for Nevada motorcyclists (SB177)
was killed by Senator Horsford when he sent it to the finance committee to die. This year, I urge you to follow in his heroic
footsteps to do the same. Here are the
top ten reasons to kill Nevada’s current helmet-choice bill, SB150:
10. Because now that Senator Schneider has
been termed out, he left behind a void of BIKER BIGOTRY that you can easily
fill.
9. To remind riders
in the 2/3rds of States with helmet choice that they should cherish that speck of liberty
that never should have been stolen from riders in any state belonging to the
U.S.
8. To motivate me to
investigate and expose allegations of on-the-job sexual misconduct by Ken Kiphart, while he
served as Administrator for the Nevada Rider Program.
7. To motivate me to
identify the misconduct/corruption of:
Alison Copening,
former State rep. Her blatant hatred
towards the biker community caused her a severe lapse of judgment – one so
grave that it likely caused her to not run again – in shame.
Shirley Breeden, former Senate Transportation Committee
chair who backstabbed the biker community that helped get her elected.
A number of bureaucrats within the Nevada Rider Program,
DPS, OTS, NHP, and others that have either resigned, changed duties, or were
busted by rights activists for corruption.
6. To coddle the
police union lobby that do your dirty work for you by enforcing the laws you
support that criminalize honest citizens.
Did LVMPD also fund your campaign?
Each year LVMPD
lobbyists PAID BY OUR TAX DOLLARS take a 580 mile 4-month vacation north to
Carson City to lobby on TAX DIME!
They argue against bills that they fear will chip away at their
power. Let’s face it, helmet laws are
NOT about saving lives and those cops know it!
THEY ARE ALL ABOUT GIVING COPS PROBABLE CAUSE TO VIOLATE BIKERS. LVMPD – alone – is responsible for the
COLD-BLOODED MURDER of 12 innocent victims in 2011, half the number of
motorcycle fatalities that same year.
Perhaps a better solution to avoid fatalities is to get rid of this
cartel of gangbangers with badges that get paid time off each time they kill an
innocent victim. http://www.lvrj.com/news/deadly-force.
5. To motivate me to expose
the tyranny at the hands of sociopathic police
officers, prosecutors, and judges who use helmets as an excuse to victimize
motorcyclists.
4. TO KILL MORE
RIDERS. In 2011, 41 motorcyclists were
killed in Nevada – ALL WEARING HELMETS!
How many of those 41 deaths could have been avoided if only they were
NOT wearing a helmet? THEY ARE DEAD AND
THEIR VOICE WILL NEVER BE HEARD! Did
their helmet inhibit vision, hearing, or senses to cause or contribute to their
fatal accident? Yes, keep Nevada’s helmet bondage law intact to kill more riders.
3. To remind all who
ride on Nevada roads that YOU, Mr. Manendo, and your like-minded, pro-law,
anti-liberty colleagues are our rulers – and your mindless drones (law
enforcement) will unleash its rogue violence against anyone that dares to
challenge unconditional obedience to YOU.
2. To motivate me to
expose EXACTLY how it was that YOU, Senator Manendo, double-crossed the biker
community when you voted NO to last session’s SB177 – a bill you had
CO-SPONSORED. Your lame excuse was that
you didn’t think 21 was an appropriate age to be a responsible helmet user. Yet 18 years old is old enough to be killed at war.
1. And finally, the top-most reason to kill
SB150 is to send a strong message to the average baby-boomer motorcyclist –
many of whom are Vietnam Vets - that THEY ARE TOO STUPID, INSANE, AND
IRRESPONSIBLE to know when and if to
wear a helmet while riding on a Nevada road.
Nothing short of a COMPLETE REPEAL of Nevada’s helmet law
will demotivate me from disinfecting with sunshine-like TRUTH, the stench of
evil over various executive, judicial, and legislative branches of Nevada’s
“democratic” system at state and local levels.
In the last two years, I have – to my great dismay – discovered that
what we have in Nevada that we call “democracy,” is really, MOB RULE! Could so many anti-liberty laws be
contributing to Nevada’s tragic economy?
While SB150 is a step in the right direction towards
promoting liberty and thus stimulating Nevada’s economy, this bill contains in
it CONDITIONAL liberty. Be honest and
admit that those “conditions” are mandates to increase profits to entities such
as training facilities, insurance companies, or others who have the funds to
lobby to force We the People to use their products or services. I do not condemn training – I condemn the gun
that would be pointed at the head of my fellow Nevada rider for not submitting
to any of your so-called “safety” training.
I will always be your obedient servant . A servant fluent in Spanish to ensure that
the people of our ethnicity know exactly how it is that you are creating laws
to force us all to bow down to your weapons!
Lily Gonzalez, USMC Vet (but that obviously does not matter.)
A message about Senator Manendo to the Nevada Latino Community:
4. TO KILL MORE RIDERS. In 2011, 41 motorcyclists were killed in Nevada – ALL WEARING HELMETS! How many of those 41 deaths could have been avoided if only they were NOT wearing a helmet? THEY ARE DEAD AND THEIR VOICE WILL NEVER BE HEARD! Did their helmet inhibit vision, hearing, or senses to cause or contribute to their fatal accident? Yes, keep Nevada’s helmet bondage law intact to kill more riders.
ReplyDeleteLily,
You are right "THEY ARE DEAD AND THEIR VOICE WILL NEVER BE HEARD!". Another good question is 'How many riders have had accidents in which their heads hit the ground or something solid like a curb, cage bumper, etc. and were able to get up and ride away because the helmet prevented an injury?
Which is why the VOLUNTARY use of helmets is the only moral option. Criminalizing the use or non use of helmets immoral. It's the pointing of a gun at a person for making a choice that may or MAY NOT help or hurt.
ReplyDeleteWe have had 6 motorcycle accidents in Vegas the last few weeks. And those are only the ones that made the news. The immoral thing would be to allow new riders, some of who don't know how to ride safely and they don't realize it, to ride without a helmet.
ReplyDeleteSort of like letting children play cops and robbers with real guns.
Six motorcycle accidents in Nevada? Well since Nevada has a helmet-bondage law, my guess is that ALL SIX WERE WEARING HELMETS. So maybe the helmet contributed to the accident. Did the helmet hinder vision, hearing, or did it act as a parachute in the wind to destabilize the rider? This idea that helmets save lives is asinine! Nothing saves lives - life is temporary - live it like you want and keep the doddamned guns out of my face - cause that's what laws are - ruler's opinions with a gun to make us obey. FUCK THAT!
DeleteAs you say Nevada has a helmet-bondage law, so it seems like there would be MANY more then only 6 accidents in the above time period. At least if the helmets were as much a cause of accidents as you believe, don't ya think?
DeleteIt would be interesting to know how many accidents occur, after which a rider is able to get up and ride, or walk, away because a helmet prevented a head injury. But that is a figure, unlike the number of riders that are unable to ride, or walk, away, that is never known.
And Lily trust me, saving lives is not important. Once a person is dead, they won't care or know about the accident. It is the people, and their caregivers, that suffer a head injury after what otherwise would be a minor incident that pay the real price.